Membership validatingpassword

For other parameters, your provider should perform validations based on the password strength enforcement properties and password question and answer configuration properties.If a provider supports extensible password validation routines, it should raise themethod.Excessive amounts of clock skew across a web farm will lead to incorrect time calculations being made in this type of scenario.A few seconds of time skew isn’t going to be noticeable, but if your servers are minutes apart, you will probably see intermittent problems with.For example, theuses a database schema that integrates with other features such as Role Manager.If this is the case for a custom provider, it should support the ability to perform a “clean” delete that can remove related data from other features prior to deleting the membership user data.If a provider doesn’t care about password lengths, then it can return the number one as a reasonable default.Thecontrols both use this property when outputting error information.

If there are broad pieces of functionality you don’t care about, you can just stub out the requisite properties and methods for that functionality in your custom provider by throwing a features in ASP.If email addresses can be updated, a custom provider should enforce the uniqueness of the new value based on thefrom the property setters for properties that are not updatable.In this way, you prevent a developer from updating property data that you don’t want to be changed via the provider.The actual user accounts may be created through some other mechanism.In this scenario, your custom provider could just choose not to implement the ability to create and update users.

Search for membership validatingpassword:

membership validatingpassword-68membership validatingpassword-21membership validatingpassword-50

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “membership validatingpassword”

  1. Second, Pb/U ratios are a function of geologic age. Finally, as Arthur Holmes (1890-1965), a British geologist pointed out, ages obtained using these new methods were often in agreement with what many geologists had speculated (Dalrymple, 1991, pp. The fact that this new method of dating utilized empirical evidence gathered in the field and analyzed in the lab with methods based upon experimentally determined physical principles made it promising and powerful.