Network problem validating identity alahyo dating
This opens the doors for an entirely new option as to how transactions will be validated on a ledger.
Let's suppose we have a distributed ledger which has 20 banks as nodes.
Another major assumption which is now being challenged is around a replicated shared database in which all of the data is synchronized that all of the nodes on the ledger have identical copies.
This is where the 3rd assumption above comes to play: A synchronization technology that allows some nodes on the ledger to have non-identical copies of the database.
Most of this information is not public knowledge yet.
However, a few companies have shared how they are doing it and I will list a few examples of such.
Once a supermajority of the nodes agree, consensus is achieved.When parties can trust each other there is no need for the inefficiencies associated with public blockchains in the form of mining and solving the "double spend" problem.(This occurs if two transactions attempt to spend the the same output, only one of those transactions will be accepted.) Without mining one can just validate the transactions and add to the chain by creating hash functions regardless and forming blocks.The health of the whole ledger depends on the ability of the parts to adapt and withstand stress.In this case that would be points of failure on how transactions get validated and who those validators are.
Search for network problem validating identity:
I highly recommend reading this paper for deep insights into this issue.